1/2/2024 0 Comments Intital d perfect shift us![]() ![]() Indeed, the US government’s record to date on AI has mostly involved vague calls for “continued United States leadership in artificial intelligence research and development” or “adoption of artificial intelligence technologies in the Federal Government,” which is fine, but not exactly concrete policy. AI policy is still pretty virgin terrain in DC, and proposals from government leaders tend to be articulated with lots of jargon, usually involving invocations of broad ideas or requests for public input and additional study, rather than specific plans for action. A bipartisan group wants to ban the use of AI to make nuclear launch decisions, at the very minimum.īut “knowing you’re going to do something” and “knowing what that something is” are two different things. ![]() ![]() I hear you loud and clear.” Independent regulators like the Federal Trade Commission have been going public to outline how they plan to approach the technology. Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer outlined his preferred approach to regulation in a June speech and promised prompt legislation, telling his audience, “many of you have spent months calling on us to act. That included commitments to both internal and third-party testing of AI products to ensure they’re secure against cyberattack and guard against misuse by bad actors. More recently, they brokered a number of voluntary safety commitments from leading AI companies in July. The White House announced a suite of artificial intelligence policies in May. And the federal government is finally getting serious about AI. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |